In a recent hearing, the Govrnor’s office tried to stop Turner from investigating the abuse of public funds.
- I was not allowed to have a jury, as the Constitution of Virginia allows.
- Burch did not appear but the hearing took place, violating the Code of Virginia.
- The hearing was remote (telephone and TV). This type of hearing is not allowed in District Court, only in Circuit Court.
- All remote hearings must have the written approval of both parties. There were none.
- Before a person is subjected to sanctions, he must have a notice of order, followed by a chance for the person subject to the order to defend himself. Usually this is 20 days. I received a notice of order five minutes before the order was entered in court on 4/20/23.
- I requested a copy of the audio portion of the democratic proceeding on several occasions since 4/20/23. Finally I was told there was none. This is destruction of evidence, which is a felony.
- The law says that the Governor’s lawyer Ms. Burch must make a transcript of the audio. This was not done.
Don’t tell anyone, but after I saw that this was going to be a remote hearing, I had time to call my office and have my recorder delivered to me at the court where Judge was doing a bit of ex parte with his handlers in Richmond and he was having trouble with the TV and the recorder. My recording is crystal clear.
8) This order that would interfere with my whistle-blower case was illegal in that it must have been filed within a 21 day period while the case was under the control of the trial court (district-Accomack).
9) I had read that a non-suit would bring the whole proceeding to a halt. When I saw that Ms. Burch was not present, I asked for a non-suit three different times. However, nothing stopped the hearing. The non-suit is suppressed. Judge Robbins even autographed a statement saying he approved of my non-suit, but injustice continued to prevail.
10) 8.01-271.1 plainly states that I cannot be sanctioned for any improper actions that I may have taken in other lawsuits. This means that whatever the sculptor, painter, author, philanthropist and whistle-blower has done must have been done on April 20, 2024.
The Governor’s attorney claims that my actions in 27 other lawsuits are to be sanctioned on April 20, 2023.
This lawsuit, therefore, can only claim that actions from April 2023 need to be sanctioned. Since this lawsuit petitioned the Governor’s assistant Ms. Burch on 3/22/23, let me give you the story on this lawsuit which is the only one that Burch et al. can claim has my sanctionable behaviors, so here we begin.
I had become interested in the Governor’s seven Small Purchase Credit Cards because the law says he can only have “one.” Ms. Burch told me that her boss had seven. Therefore, I asked her under 2.2-3705.1.1(ii) for the names. But she refused to give them to me. So I filed this one and only petition that is eligible for sanctions. When the judge ruled against me, I appealed.
A year later the District Court ruled that I was two days late on a 10-day limitation for an appeal of the of the April 20, 2023 hearing, so I may have been two days late. However, when I appealed the case on May 3, 2023 and paid $136.00 (and asked for a jury), the Circuit Court gave me 30 days to appeal. So it would seem that my “two days late” should have been overlooked.
Besides, the law says that I should have a copy of the audio recording before making an appeal, and the Governor’s gang would not let me have a copy of it. So, I am being sanctioned for my bad behavior when the Governor’s Ms.Burch falsely claims that she had no name lists of SPCC holders. At this point I present to you two documents that Burch was hiding. These are, of course, felonies in violation of 18.1-471. So who exactly should be sanctioned?
We are almost finished but to show you how the Governor’s gang has conspired with their hand-picked Judge Robbins to keep me under control, remember that Judge Robbins fabricated a document saying that she was present after the hearing was over.
What kind of chance do I have of justice when Judge Robbins falsely claims that Burch was present when she was not. His signature on this document means that he knew that she had to be present before it began, as the law requires. Yet he allows the now illegal motion to proceed in violation of the law. If anyone wants to see the documents that I have, let me know.
This is a serious crime and it threatens the careers of Chris Bernardt and Denise Burch.
However harsh I may sound, I do not wish to see the careers of these employees damaged. They are only following orders. However, the Governor and the Attorney General should be held responsible as they are the ones misappropriating public funds, which i am entitled to investigate under the Virginia Fraud Acts.
Here is a preview:
- The OAG charges FOIA requests at the rate of $89 per hour (other public bodies are $15-20 per hour), but yet he only pays his employees $35 an hour. He claims that the $89 per hour, a new record, is the actual cost. You won’t believe this, but he has given me an estimate of over $2 million for documents that he wants to hide.
- Then we will do the Governor’s 110 duplicate double dippings, the records for which have now disappeared.
- The Comptroller is in violation of Section 11 which says that no law can be amended without the approval of the General Assembly.
So instead of providing records, as the Code of Virginia and Senate Bill 340 require, he amends the bill by saying that the requestor must get his information from the dispenser (the one who is stealing public funds) who wouldn’t provide the public documents in the first place.
Coming Soon: The Supreme Court, Where the Big Money Is.